The　article　discussed　the　price　distortions　issues　in　the　land　transfer　of　mining　resources.　The　paper　revealed　that　the　collective　interests　of　losses　epitomized　in　the　rights　of　surface　and　underground　rights＇contradiction,while　the　land　transfer　process　lacked　a　reasonable　assessment　of　the　land　transfer　price　mechanism　to　balance　the　interests　of　all　stakeholders.　Thus,under　the　premise　of　recognition　in　the　status　of　rural　collective　land　ownership,the　land　transfer　price　mechanism　was　discussed.　In　terms　of　the　absence　of　ecological　compensation　mechanism　in　the　land　transfer　of　mining　resources,taking　the　example　of　the　existence　of　transaction　costs,the　paper　discussed　the　distribution　of　environmental　property　rights　and　the　optimizing　of　the　environmental　governance.　The　article　further　pointed　out　that　in　the　establishment　of　an　effective　price　assessment　mechanism　in　land　transfer,we　should　respect　the　people＇s　objective　value　and　subjective　value　losses,thus　reflected　them　in　the　land　transfer　price　and　give　reasonable　compensation.　We　should　promote　the　reform　of　mineral　resources＇property　rights　and　reduce　government　distortions　to　promote　mineral　market　process　in　the　mineral　field.　The　construction　of　green　financial　transfer　payment　system,environmental　taxation,green　legal　system　and　land　transfer　compensation　mechanism　should　be　promoted.　Part　of　the　surface　rights　and　underground　rights　needed　to　achieve　unity　in　order　to　reduce　dispute　in　the　process　of　land　transfer.　To　promote　the　legitimacy,tradability　and　the　transfer　of　land　ownership,needed　an　effective　division　of　land　ownership　to　ensure　the　normal　functioning　of　the　land　market.　Environmental　taxes　should　be　levied　for　mining　rights　to　reflect　national　ownership　interest.　To　reach　the　optimal　effect　of　environmental　tax,requiring　a　series　of　conditions　and　supporting　reforms.　To　make　the　social　welfare　maximization,we　should　give　a　certain　environmental　rights　to　rural　collectives　in　the　premise　of　governments＇role　of　public　service.　The　government　responsible　for　environmental　governance　is　more　appropriate.　The　environmental　rights　should　be　broadly　rather　than　narrowly　subordinate　to　surface　rights,or　the　clearly　defining　of　environmental　property　rights　will　need　larger　external　costs.